Replying to Avatar π–‹π–Žπ–†π–™π–‰π–Šπ–“π–Žπ–Šπ–— (Β―`◕‿◕´¯)

So you are telling me, we have the technology to see the edge of the universe which is β€œ46 billion light years away” if you can even prove that and yet can’t figure out how to generate energy without burning fossil fuel? πŸ˜†πŸ˜†πŸ˜†
Avatar
Wicked 2y ago

Correct. And, by the way, the light we are seeing has only traveled a little over 13 billion light years. 46 billion light years is how far away the edge is now, after the Universe has expanded in that 13 billion years. It’s amazing the things we can build when we put our top engineers together and give them essentially unlimited resources. JWST ended up costing $10 billion. 😳

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
π–‹π–Žπ–†π–™π–‰π–Šπ–“π–Žπ–Šπ–— (Β―`◕‿◕´¯) 2y ago

Lol. Let’s assume you are right. Do you how much energy you need to transfer a single photon 13 billion light years away let alone the light from billion of stars? and you think seeing the edge is more important than inventing a sustainable energy source for the planet? πŸ˜†

Avatar
dr.fred 2y ago

oil is sustainable. abundant and renewable

another lie from the same crooks who operate the central banks

they also operate the oil companies

the drug cartels

and the military

Avatar
Reed 2y ago

I disagree with most "investments" in space technology. But I believe that we will eventually need to utilize the resources of the solar system that are not on earth if we are going to continue scaling humanity.

It should be done with the free market though not by government decree. JWST may be cool and all, free market probably could have done it at 1/10th the price if there was an actual market demand for it.