Whats your models security budget for bitcoin when everyones using custodians? Seriously brain dead

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Why would I advocate for custodial use? L2 doesn't have to be custodial. Lightning isn't by default.

It is by default for 90% of users. Stop ignoring real world usage stats

I don't care about how other people use it. I care about how people CAN use it. Trust me, I'm a huge critic of lightning UX.

Sovereignty for the few who have a stack big enough to manage channels. Custodians for everyone else.

Yes. Part of my criticism. It does not scale Bitcoin to everyone. I can't.

So your solution? I say bip300 and bip301

Drive chains is an idea. I'd like to see it in practice. Nothing stopping them. Hard to say how it would actually work until it's in practice.

Layer 2 labs version is active on testnet

Its not ux is user requirements

Ux is user requirement...

Security budget is Bullshit that people who don't know enough about mining think we need to sustain the network. The network creates its own budget. It's self sufficient.

Care to explain how that works haha?

Oh magic ngu technology? Haha

Technology is deflationary, Bitcoin is fixed. So ngu forever... It's simple math.

ifffffff its actually used as money and not superseded by an alternative chain

So which one you gunna mine? Fedcoin or Bitcoin?

Bitcoin or death for me. We need good incentive structures for the rest

Ifff it doesn't become daily money for everyone then its just a collectable