She texted me and asked me if she was missing something because she finds the debunking, relies on 1 of 3 things: A contrary expert opinion. She asks how can an opinion "debunk" something without discrediting the evidence with counter evidence?

Or it relies on facts with limited or shakey proof put out by the very people who are suspected of being part of the conspiracy. She asks, what else are they going to say? Or it calls into question one supporting piece of evidence with reasonable 2/3