I prefer trusting observable facts, rather than someones pure hypotheses. If something can’t be provably explained, I would rather admit that it is an unknown, then try to fit it in any of the existing theories.

Not sure that I agree with the last paragraph. In my mind, anything that can’t be properly proven is not science, but rather someone’s fantasies which have a high probability of having nothing in common with reality. But that is semantics, I guess…

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.