I know it was a challenge for Satoshi to stay anon even 15 years ago. I'm not convinced it's even possible today if the right group wants you exposed. And if it is possible, it'll probably take a lot more work than Satoshi had to put in.

I think what will ultimately be more important is distributed development. By that I mean developers living in many jurisdictions around the world. And yes, being anon to the extent they can will only help the mission.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yea, even a basic pseudonym is a step in the right direction… do something to keep your Ego out of Bitcoin dev conversations

Maxwell, Gavin, Wuille, Luke Dash Jr, Jeremy Rubin,

None of these guys are even trying to stay anonymous.

We need more Bruce Waynes to wake up and realize it’s better to work on Bitcoin behind a mask.