Replying to Avatar Gigi

Discuss.

At first I was really upset and protective. As time has moved on and I've discussed it more, my opinions have changed. I don't like it. I think it's dumb. And that's okay. I'm allowed to have my own thoughts and opinions. I can't tell someone how they're supposed to use Bitcoin. I trust that the system will work itself out given enough time. Until that happens, I'm looking at this as an orange pilling event. I'm helping NFT fans run Bitcoin nodes, Lightning nodes, and teaching them about UTXOs. It's great for Bitcoin...for now.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

This is stupid and was never the intended use. Shitcoiners should move their shit jpegs to L2 or side chains.

I think there are fundamentally 2 good technical take-aways.

1. Bitcoin lacks fungibility. 1 sat != 1 sat. There is surveillance and taint and now this.

2. Bitcoin is the most permanent monument upon which to write things, even if it's meant for transactions; it is obviously desirable to put other fancy things on there, like contracts, titles, nfts, etc. if you want to truly depend upon them for real life reasons.

I believe both of these issues are addressed by Roll-ups tech, and I'm hopeful that this Ordinals stuff will push people to accept some soft-forked changes to Bitcoin to enable such a thing.

To be clear, I'm also 100% for a soft fork that fixes this unintented use case πŸ€™

……and potentially introduces a new issue. Less change = better

Agreed πŸ‘