Is your position to soft fork bringing in quantum resistance addresses and let old legacy, taproot or exposed PK be raided out and out?
Or are you open to limiting the spend rate or another alternative?
saylor seems to be advocating for a hard fork that forces people to move coin.
burning those who do not comply.
this breaks the fundamental social contract and value prop of bitcoin: sovereign ownership and property rights.
it must be opposed. strongly.
https://blossom.primal.net/09bdeb018313b0eeeca3d178fb0b183bd4fb75bb29df30bb7d0dfe79d12402ed.mp4
Discussion
No replies yet.