I understand where they’re coming from too - and more widespread adoption of sound money *would* contribute to human flourishing - I completely agree.

But Bitcoin also doesn’t need trump, and my concern is that the negative ramifications of putting him in charge of a country like this would range from problematic to disastrous. (Republicans/comservatives used to be so firmly skeptical of Russia, and now the favorite contender has such severely unaddressed daddy issues that he aches for approval from authoritarian dictators like Putin and KJU…

I guess, to me he’s just so transparently unfit and incompetent for a serious role like president of the fucking USA 🤦‍♂️

And Biden was no longer a fit president either FWIW, and most politicians are corrupt to varying degrees. But come on - trump has been a literal modern clown for his entire career. And his “humor” just masks the insidiousness of parts of his platform.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

I thought most black people prospered more under Trump from purely financial perspective or did I miss something? (Not American)

I will just add one little thing. The comment on being white. I'd suggest dumping the colourist thing. It muddies stuff. We are tribal creatures and one has to consider that part of our nature a little, but to bring things down to colour of skin is to drive division. I mean that in all ways. If there is a particular racial or colour group with a tendency to certain characteristics, it's not surprising it becomes cliched or commented on. It is individual interaction that drives perception As someone who is white by skin colour and who suffered years of racist abuse by other white people from different ethnic origins, I find this whole skin colour obsession is becoming ridiculous. If everything simply gets labelled as racist according to skin colour, it's got the potential to reduce understanding of division and the reasons that cause it.