Bitcoin Optech newsletter #343 is here:

- summarizes a post about having full nodes ignore transactions that are relayed without being requested first

- summarizes popular Q&A from Stack Exchange

- Optech Newsletter #343 Recap on Riverside

https://bitcoinops.org/en/newsletters/2025/02/28/

Antoine Riard posted to Bitcoin-Dev two draft BIPs that would allow a node to signal that it will no longer accept tx messages that it had not requested using an inv message, called unsolicited transactions...

https://bitcoinops.org/en/newsletters/2025/02/28/#ignoring-unsolicited-transactions

Selected Q&A from Bitcoin Stack Exchange:

- What’s the rationale for how the loadtxsoutset RPC is set up?

- Are there pinning attacks that RBF rule #3 makes impossible?

- Unexpected locktime values

- Why is it necessary to reveal a bit in a script path spend and check that it matches the parity of the Y coordinate of Q?

- Why does Bitcoin Core use checkpoints??

- How does Bitcoin Core handle long reorgs?

- What is discard feerate?

- Policy to miniscript compiler

https://bitcoinops.org/en/newsletters/2025/02/28/#selected-qa-from-bitcoin-stack-exchange

Bitcoin Optech will host an audio recap discussion of this newsletter on Riverside.fm Tuesday at 15:30 UTC. Join us to discuss or ask questions!

https://riverside.fm/studio/bitcoin-optech

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.