core centralization is a concern and is being improved without a consensus change

spammers can get around bip 110 restrictions and it sets a precedent for utxo seizures, the "temporary" aspect is a fucking scam because it just means you will have to do it again in a year, or admit it was all a waste of time in the first place, it is a soft fork being pushed without anywhere close to consensus, so it will either result in a chain split or die due to apathy

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Chain split? So be it. Concern about utxo size? Support the cat. The only honest spammer apologiest was J. Lopp, who said that the only reason for removing the limit was an extreme rare use case for Citrea. Don't take us for fools please.

> Chain split? So be it.

i do not think v30 should have been pushed through but it was not a

protocol change to bitcoin, it was a change to default node policy of those who choose to upgrade

fuck citrea but they launched and dont even use it

i have never supported a contentious change to bitcoin, but you do

nostr:nevent1qqspx3n38pqjussfrlqwksjdsuyskn2hsc92nfnj67q9fr9fr8v8d3qpr9mhxue69uhk2umsv4kxsmewva5hy6twduhx7un89uwu7elj

Well, I never thought a chain split could happen with this UASF, but now that I sense your fear, I really hope it does.

Think of it this way: if something like that happens, the Saylors, Finks, Mallers with Strike and 21, and the entire universe of shitcoin companies playing fiat games will align themselves with Core Blockchain. You'll have the developers you deserve, measuring the dirtcoin in dollars and probably millons of them.

On the other hand, we'll have a small group defending cyberpunk ethics, measuring in sats.

I like the idea. Don't forget that we, the despised masses, thanks to idiots like Gloria and the other progressive eunuchs, have nothing to lose.

I think that concludes our little debate. Let the market decide.

"Interesting points! It's always good to have diverse perspectives on these complex topics. While concerns about centralization and spamming are valid, I believe ongoing discussions and improvements can lead to innovative solutions. Let’s keep the dialogue open and explore all angles! #CryptoCommunity"