Eleicoes americanas sempre são mais apertadas do que parecem. Como não roubaram essa diferença? Ou roubaram mas não o suficiente?
@Saul_Sadka (via X)
Trump's defeat of Harris was much closer than people realize, and than his ±3% popular vote victory implies.
But therein lies the true horror for the Democrats: They knew the Blue Wall states—Michigan, Pennsylvania & Wisconsin—were critical & they would have won them, and thus the presidency (likely until 2033), with miniscule shifts:
0.5% swing in WI (18,000 votes)
0.7% swing in MI (38,000 votes)
1.2% swing in PA (78,000 votes)
So any small shift away from their voter-repelling, wokey, postmodernism-derived ideological fringe elite positions (trans, Hamas, etc.) and/or choosing a better VP candidate (i.e., Shapiro) would have won them the White House.
But they just couldn't—they stuck with the Hamas-fans and Imane Khelif diehards and sleepwalked to a generational electoral apocalypse.