I’m grounded, Bitcoin is my proof. Your ontology is not you’ve literally just trusted a narrative. Until you can define simultaneity at the Planck scale, the framework you’re invoking has no physical foundation. Without that definition, your interpretation of superposition remains an unverified assumption rather than established physics.

“And he said, Go, and say to this people: Hear indeed, but understand not; see indeed, but perceive not.” — Isaiah 6:9

I’m not the one defending the idea that Bitcoin is broken. Good luck with that.