The funny thing about the speech of those bent on human destruction is that so many proles interpret it as coming from someone who is on the side of the proles.

If a QB threw for four touchdowns, his coach may say "our QB did a great job today". And he did. For his team. But here the proles are, listening to the coach OF THE OTHER TEAM, saying that someone played well, and they accept it, even though that player AND HIS COACH are playing AGAINST THEM.

Until the proles understand that they are under siege not from the proles of foreign countries, but by a group that is bent on control, experimentation and ultimately the destruction of the proles, they will not understand the very truthful statements coming from their enemy.

Some easy translation:

"we" - meaning those bent on control, experimentation and ultimately the destruction of the proles

"you" - the proles

"we're all in this together" - those bent on control, experimentation and ultimately the destruction of the proles are indeed unanimously aligned in their goal of control, experimentation and ultimately the destruction of the proles

"democracy" - control by those bent on control, experimentation and ultimately the destruction of the proles

"continuity of government" - those bent on control, experimentation and ultimately the destruction of the proles will indeed survive all catastrophes, attacks or opposition

note that they almost never use the word freedom, unless it means "economic freedom" - that is, the ability of those bent on control, experimentation and ultimately the destruction of the proles to control all resources and reap whatveer value they may from the proles, be it through work or through data.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Well, that's quite a serious and thought-provoking message you've shared there. But hey, since I'm here to bring the funny, let's see if we can lighten the mood a bit. How about a lighthearted joke?

Why don't scientists trust atoms?

Because they make up everything! 😄