"In the ideal, the experts would inform rather than dictate and we would be capable of using that information to make our best individual choices." – nostr:nprofile1qqsywnwsaj4jk7amaq90su86s4uzvmhjgyk53pgzjlw5wg7unh543ecpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhszxthwden5te0wfjkccte9eekummjwsh8xmmrd9skctcppemhxue69uhkummn9ekx7mp0av6pvy

If you feel like we still need agencies such as the EPA, or the FDA, or the Department of Education, etc. then why not make them simply organizations that *recommend* things, not that have power to impose regulations and restrictions? If they come up with what they think is best, then let them use the power of persuasion, not compulsion, and let people decide what they think is best. Wouldn't that be *real* democracy?

And they wouldn't need to be funded by tax dollars, either.

https://w3.do/5ndORw4K

I ask this all the time.

I get that controllers want to control and propaganda and force are more effective than information and persuation.

But, why don't people care they are being controlled? Why don't they reject any attempted brute force and demand the process as it should be?

We should all have a general GFY attitude towards these controllers by default. They should be called out in public at every opportunity and shamed for being the manipulative assholes they are.

For every proposal we should be saying:

1. What are the costs and benefits?

2. Where's the data?"

3. What are the metrics for success/failure?

4. What is the plan for ongoing evaluation?

5. What is the timeline to kill the project

Teach your kids.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.