Thank you for question, helped clarify my thought. “List” is so purposefully ambiguous it doesn’t point to anything specific enough for people to rally about. There were likely many “visitors” that didn’t engage with minors. Though their presence could be considered damning, it’s not criminal.

“Release the videos of officials sexually engaging with minors!”

This is clear, concise and hard to dodge.

Thanks again

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

they don't need to release videos, we can't watch that. What theyshould release is the list of clients. and all of them should be arrested asap

Yeah, videos would be rated “X,” therefore not releasable I’m sure. What smoking gun do we have? Who can we trust to review and say, “These specific officials engaged in criminal acts,” therefore prosecution could proceed?