The problem there is not the need for moderation, but the want of control to be able to segregate and isolate with all sorts of agendas.
Discussion
it does make sense to want to control the kind of content that appears on your own website though, I understand #[2]'s point
Where does the equation account for content control and people control when splitting headaches are a factor?
See the problem is not how to ensure a secure and controllable management, but our expectation for people to constrain themselves into controllable constrained behaviors, and the social engineering, be it by script or training has a fundamental flaw, feeding conflict which already is a social engineering entrapment.
Censorship makes sense in certain situations. For example, I’m running an educational bitcoin-only website where I post all my materials. For obvious reasons I don’t want to have comments to my posts which promote shitcoins or scam projects.
regulate content by all means, but man needing to adapt to machine borgs.
How to explain the plague of social regurgitation elsewise?
War aside and stuff. Does censorship account for a plague?
While intelligence having illuminated every cause of the terminal dynamic, be it fake news, plague or war.
Then whether lunch depends on feeding false cored social constructs of demons past to learn the hard way, if the atom.
Then let’s train mechanisms to repeat our humanism with intentional feeding conflicts of false cored social constructs on scale to expect humans general dynamic to be kept at bay as if King Kong rampaging is going to be quite entertaining to watch.