#civicsforentitledassholes

Supremacy Clause Argument

The strongest argument against the validity of the 14th Amendment is that it violates the “Supremacy Clause” of the U.S. Constitution Article 6 Paragraph 2. The Supremacy Clause states that the Constitution is the supreme law of the land. The original Constitution and Bill of Rights created a citizen of the several states in Article 4 Section 2. This original state citizen was not a corporation, as later defined in the 14th Amendment.

The 14th Amendment created a new national citizenship and granted the federal government expanded powers. It did this without proper ratification according to the process defined in the original Constitution. Therefore, the 14th Amendment violates the Supremacy Clause by overriding and changing the original Constitution without lawful authority. Any law or amendment that conflicts with the original Constitution is null and void. The 14th Amendment should be considered unconstitutional based on the Supremacy Clause.

House Adoption Issues

The 14th Amendment was adopted by the House of Representatives unconstitutionally. Ten Southern states were excluded from the vote after the Civil War, even though they had been readmitted to the Union. The 39th Congress claimed these states did not have lawful governments, so they were put under military rule and excluded from voting on the 14th Amendment.

New state governments were then formed under military authority in violation of the Constitution. Once these new puppet state governments ratified the 14th Amendment, they were allowed congressional representation again. However, forming new state governments without the consent of the existing state legislatures and excluding lawfully reconstituted states from voting are direct violations of Article IV Section 3 and Article V of the Constitution. The House adoption of the 14th Amendment was therefore unconstitutional.

https://thefreedompeople.org/blog/the14th-amendment-unconstitutional-treason-or-lawful-ratification/