I asked you a series of questions that you failed to answer with any substance. You said sugar is good because of energy. I proceeded to talk you that something is not inherently good because it has energy. I named shoelaces and sawdust. You then introduced “easy” into the conversation. I asked you for a definition. You provided the conventional definition of easy and not one that pertains to metabolism. Your claims were empty as it were.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.