Bitcoin is fundamentally against censorship of all kinds.
Discussion
Is this censorship?
Luke has included Whirlpool in his roster of Bitcoin transactions subject to censorship, alongside Ordinals and inscriptions.
That's not true, whirlpool was transacting bitcoin exceeding the standard 42 byte datacarrier size limit. Samourai didn't understand their transactions weren't being censored and that the datacarrier size limit is now being enforced.
The OP_RETURN limit has been 80 bytes since Bitcoin Core version 0.12
https://bitcoin.org/en/release/v0.12.0
PS: I hate ordinals and inscription but in the end... let the free market decide how the block space is used as long as the users pay for it.
