Subnostr

Random ideas

What if a relay cost is covered by certain percentage/fixed amount of zap that goes to its subscriber.

Hence someone that doesn't receive any zap doesn't pay a dime

And someone that receive some zap contribute a bit to keep the lights on, as at the end of the day he is the main beneficiary of the zap

But with a cap on the amount of zap the relay can absorb. No more than the actual server cost

Would this make a good public relay?

#plebchain #nostr #nip

Pleb⚡ 2y ago

nostr:npub18kzz4lkdtc5n729kvfunxuz287uvu9f64ywhjz43ra482t2y5sks0mx5sz nostr:npub18ams6ewn5aj2n3wt2qawzglx9mr4nzksxhvrdc4gzrecw7n5tvjqctp424 wdyt?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Mazin 2y ago

This requires client coordination so can’t just be done on relay side. It may be hard to get several clients to adopt that standard.

Also, generally speaking there is more to be paid than just the server costs anyway. How about the time spent maintaining the relay by its operator(s)?

Pleb⚡ 2y ago

Ah yes, operator cost too

Hmm, not really feasible then ya.. perhaps the closest one was Damus version of zap where zap sender can allocate part of the zap amount for Damus. But it's from sender instead of receiver.

Since client have more control than relay, then maybe relays that is run by client will continue to be the most basic public/free client then. And more high quality private client like wine still need to live based on subscription