Thank you :-)

Yes! I thought about the "mu" in Lemuria before, especially after reading Don's question which included Lemuria and Ra's answer which did not include the word Lemuria. Ra switched it to Mu.

That led me to think that there is perhaps some kind of nuanced difference between Mu and Lemuria while, at the same time, a connection. If Lemuria and Mu were perfectly one and the same, Ra likely would have used Lemuria in their response instead of choosing to use Mu.

Churchward and Le Plongeon's work suggests that Mu was based on their now almost entirely sunken South Pacific continent ranging from Fiji to Hawaii to Rapa Nui. They said Mu had colonies in South America, North America (like probably Mount Shasta), Asia (Uyghurs, Nagas, Persians), and in Egypt.

-According to legends in India, Kumari Kandam was very much real.

-We do have the weirdness to explain with Lemurs not existing anywhere between Madagascar and India like that.

-If Mu had colonies in India and Egypt, and Kumari Kandam existed, Kumari Kandam likely would have been populated as well and would have been a part of the Mu colonial empire of the Sun.

-Looking at Google Earth south of India and Sri Lanka, there is a label called "British Indian Ocean Territory". If I chase that to the Wikipedia page, their motto is "Limuria is in our trust".

Based on those points, I'm prone to agree with you, that Lemuria was the same thing as Kumari Kandam which was part of the great Mu global colonial civilization.

I'm not sure but those clues cause me to lean in that direction.