Of course you are free to run software with filters on it. There's a difference between what works at the network level and what people individually do.
Reasoning by analogy isn't going to work here IMO
Has nostr:nprofile1qqspnlha0uuujmf07ahc0amz0tnez3dujuwc4v3jq5q9jwd94yfmctcprpmhxue69uhhqun9d45h2mfwwpexjmtpdshxuet5qyt8wumn8ghj7etyv4hzumn0wd68ytnvv9hxgtcpr3mhxue69uhkummnw3ez6ur4vgh8xetdd9ek7mpwv3jhvtcgllzeu been corrupted by some (hidden) interest conflict as well? This is certainly not a Austrian argument https://x.com/stephanlivera/status/1917983490605498599?t=vYHYczywIDNH4mzMvfyzig Who owns the houses being distorted? That's communist ideology. The house owners are free to use spam filters if they like to do so to prevent their houses to be distorted would be the correct analogy.
Of course you are free to run software with filters on it. There's a difference between what works at the network level and what people individually do.
Reasoning by analogy isn't going to work here IMO
No replies yet.