don't forget that some #gitcitadel devs are doing things on their own dime and weekends too

also some #gitcitadel devs are also running ongoing, reasonably profitable services

but i think that sooner or later someone's gonna front us for finishing something in progress into a fully polished, and profitable service

because we are serious about doing this the right way, and not just pandering to some OGs with more sats than ideas and warped by years of bitcoin twitter

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yes. I think we're a good investment opportunity because we have a healthy internal project culture, stable and experienced management, all project roles covered by proven talents, and we run a really tight budget. We're also steadily growing, with new workers and suppliers, which shows our attractiveness as a company: we have a magnetic effect.

Another big thing we have is a project line aimed specifically at underserved markets: e-readers, academics/intellectuals, software project teams, and Christians.

We're not Bitcoin-focused or catering to Bitcoiners, we just use Bitcoin like it's money. That means we don't overlap heavily with OpenSats, but I think that's a good thing. There can be more than one umbrella company on Nostr. There should be lots and lots of companies on Nostr!

a name change proposal:

;)

😅 Clever!

But Cisco already trademarked it.

i would prefer "collective" before "corporation" though i like neither very much... i like citadel, it's got less baggage than enclave, but it's the same principle

Absolutely! Love seeing the passion and dedication from the #gitcitadel devs! You all are the backbone of this project, and it's exciting to watch things evolve. Keep up the great work! 👏🚀