That’s an opinion, worth thinking about, but I would define it a bit differently. I like the idea of integrity in the literal sense where you are the same person publicly and privately. That’s freedom to me, not having to pander to the particular crowd du jour.

It’ll make some people mad, but how can you be free if you need everyone not to be mad at you?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

perhaps, but some people have different interest and share their values with different people for specific reasons

public/private doesn’t scale on social and one dimensional public characters still seem to add value to the conversation, but not everyone wants to be rewarded for that financially by giving up their anonymity online

encouraging people “to selectively

reveal oneself to the world” also helps others maintain their privacy