I agree - it was a very thoughtful, lively, and dynamic exchange and intentioned efforts toward resolution and refinement, occurring in multiple threads and from different reference frame. Things were learned and the general effort is refined and persist. --- As a general observer with limited context(s) it does seem there might be an improvement to general 'NIP' process with respect to 'roll-out' of new features and their potentially-irrevocable implementation re:backwards compatibility for all clients and participants --- If there were an official 'Inaugral NIP- Implementation 24hr Community Review & Comment' window or something. --- To give everyone a chance to say, "Yep. That's what we all meant and agreed to and support. And a chance to also say, OH! You missed this bit here....' Kinda thing. --- Or so it seemed.