I was thinking about total Bitcoin price response being made up of distinct parts:

1) Adoption Demand,

2) Supply Halving, and

3) Fiat Devaluation.

But, when we judge a new all-time high, it’s oft from three to four years ago. A lot of devaluation may have happened in that time. So, if we look at the bitcoin price against the US consumer price index median year-over-year, suddenly there’s no all-time high yet, the pattern stabilizes, and next steps look queued up nicely as we beat our head against the past all-time-high wall. Is my approach an effective method of removing the inflation impact on price levels? Definitely seems to cut out some of the price chaos.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

nostr:npub1a2cww4kn9wqte4ry70vyfwqyqvpswksna27rtxd8vty6c74era8sdcw83a did I appropriately exclude the inflation element from the Bitcoin price action using this approach?

Interesting but CPI Is lagging a lot as I recall. Can you use truflation data to compare https://truflation.com/marketplace/us-inflation-rate

BTCUSD/USCPIM is the symbol for TradingView to duplicate the screenshot if you want to play with it. I just get a kick out of shaving off the inflation element of the price action, if this is an effective way to do it (I asked Lyn but she didn’t answer. 🤷‍♂️. If so, it seems like it would leave the adoption and supply impacts of price action for better cycle to cycle comparison.

Is truflation available in TradingView?

I’ll look…

Dang. It’s there, but its data only started in 2025, so no real back-data to blend it with history. You’re right.

That would have been cool.