Nostr Web Client

Well archinstall makes it as easy as debian

Upgrades are non-trivial as they'd have to be familiar with command-line and most would be perplexed by the many options.. I believe Gardua (built on arch) has a graphical upgrade manager though. op mentions Manjaro which is an arch distro. I use arch, it is meant for those who are willing to upgrade regularly and can handle when it fails.

Personally for n00bs I would go for Mint OS, Zorin or Elementary OS which all have graphical update/upgrade options and are very familiar to those who come from Wind0ze.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

fc994dc4... 2y ago

Well it depends, there are people that start with arch, but a minority, not the rule. I suggest Debian for my friends starting with Linux, I don't see why mint and etc could be better as those distros keep newbies away from the terminal. I know some that used mint Ubuntu and etc and are very afraid if using terminal, of doing SSH into a node...I think the earlier one breaks that mith that terminal is hard or for hackers the merrier.

fc994dc4... 2y ago

I also discuss that with friends about nodes, better to start with raspibolt, so you learn everything. If you use umbrel or raspiblitz and others once you have a real problem it will be harder to solve.