I do not know. Never put an esim on mine.

cc nostr:nprofile1qqsz9ackramwqadeuz39pfz83p9vpxcykcmwlltuwqafyw2w60ann6qpz4mhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuerpd46hxtnfduhszythwden5te0dehhxarj9emkjmn99uq3jamnwvaz7tmswfjk66t4d5h8qunfd4skctnwv46z75q6q67

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Folks, please (heavily) consider silent.link .

🔽🔽 Here's some info about why their particular esims are more secure than your average ISP controlled eSim:

https://silent.link/faq

The real issue is the phone number. That's the attack vector. Allowing inbound only remediates that issue entirely. But most people feel they can't live without a number. I'd argue the contrary.

Remember, privacy is a layered approach. Otherwise it's called "secrecy" and you don't want that, cause then you be one a target, like a government agency.