Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar JeffG

The degree to which non-technical people weigh in on very technical topics in Bitcoin has always surprised me.

It's not like people go around getting pissy with brain surgeons about the merits of a new procedure, or start yelling at particle physicists about the proper way to aim a neutrino...

What makes these folks think that they have any idea about the tradeoffs inherent in complex crypto-systems?

I think more devs (especially the bitcoin core devs) would do well to simply ignore the noise, most of the time. Only give your valuable time to people who have shown the proof of work and bring intellectual honesty to the conversation.

Avatar
Kretchino 7mo ago

I'm starting to feel Roger Ver and a point when he claimed Core had highjacked Bitcoin...

Luckily nobody is forced to upgrade to the latest "monkey jpg compatible" version of core, and that we have nostr:npub1lh273a4wpkup00stw8dzqjvvrqrfdrv2v3v4t8pynuezlfe5vjnsnaa9nk to remove the crap with the #bitcoinKnots implementation.

In the end, it's the nodes that make up the network that determine what bitcoin is or isn't, or have you forgotten about the UASF already?🤔

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.