The article called the manipulation "fortifying" the election.
Me: There was a big write up about how the 2020 election was won by a coordinated effort between big tech, ngos, and paid protestors in a big media outlet, something like vanity fair. Do you know what it was?
ChatGPT: The article you're referring to was published in *TIME* magazine and detailed what the author, Molly Ball, described as a "shadow campaign" to "save" the 2020 election. This effort involved a coordinated effort among various entities, including big tech companies, NGOs, labor unions, and political operatives. The goal was to influence the election process to ensure a specific outcome, which the participants justified as necessary to protect democracy from what they saw as a potential subversion by former President Trump.
The article discusses how these groups worked to change voting systems and laws, promoted mail-in voting, and implemented extensive public-awareness campaigns. It also mentions how social media companies were pressured to take a harder stance against disinformation and to control the narrative surrounding the election. This coordinated effort was seen by those involved as fortifying the election rather than rigging it, believing that their actions were essential to ensure a fair outcome.
For a deeper dive into this topic, you can read the original *TIME* article [here](https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/)