Replying to Avatar furio

I’m sorry the Supreme Court and the Constitution disagree with your desire.

I want to take all *federal* government intervention that is unconstitutional and “send it to the states,” exactly like they did when overturning Roe.

Then if a state tries something *unconstitutional* I expect the Supreme Court to overturn, as is the agreed upon “law of the land.”

That is my position, always has been, and I do not accept your premise that you try to frame as something I “probably agree with.”
Avatar
The Stacker Monster 6mo ago

simple question, do you agree that people should have as much freedom as possible with as little government interference in their lives?

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
furio 6mo ago

Broadly speaking yes. I’m not anarchic tho.

And I would live in a state with severe restrictions on murdering babies.

That’s the beauty of the 50 state governmental experiments. I would fight the battles that matter to me and move to a better state if it was too oppressive.

But outside of that answer to your broad question and my above addition you shouldn’t put any more “beliefs” on me that I should or shouldn’t hold.

Simple question for you: do you agree that roe and other extra-constitutional laws should be decided at the state level and not the federal level, as the 10A states?