You’re right. I just disagree with the notion that 100k sats is a ‘small’ amount; it’s 10% of 1 million and a significant sum. Anyway, we could handle it via zap, but there’s a risk that the counterparty might not send the sats. We should adhere to the principle of ‘don’t trust, verify.’ In the contract, if the judge acts in bad faith, we could block or move the money.
Needs to be on lightning bro. Its built for smaller amounts like 100k sats. Its instant and private.
nostr:nprofile1qqsqfjg4mth7uwp307nng3z2em3ep2pxnljczzezg8j7dhf58ha7ejgprdmhxue69uhhyetvv9ujucnfw33k76twwpshy6ewvdhk6qguwaehxw309ahx7um5wghx6at5d9h8jampd3kx2apwvdhk6qg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0udvd2m might have a lot on his plate but if he's OK. I'm good.
We could also find a trusted 3rd party where we each send 100k sats to now, and when the results are in they send one of us 200k
Discussion
No replies yet.