Replying to Avatar DanConwayDev

nostr links within event content are now displayed. There are previews for repos, issue and patches.

nostr:nevent1qy2hwumn8ghj7ur4wfcxcetjv4kxz7fwvdhk6qpqrs5shxk8ems0d878tymvntej4zcv4rvg7ntcpac5539xrcvvntss5j5wak

I'm now thinking it would be a lot better to display a wiki instead of the ReadMe on the repository homepage.

What do you think nostr:npub1wqfzz2p880wq0tumuae9lfwyhs8uz35xd0kr34zrvrwyh3kvrzusk cqsyn nostr:npub1l5sga6xg72phsz5422ykujprejwud075ggrr3z2hwyrfgr7eylqstegx9z nostr:npub1896p07z8xngpct5ma00mdrad4gqfnwfwdqcl706wrm25ajynahhs27x5ge?

This would require adding support for showing wiki content but that's no bad thing. Showing the ReadMe by querying the server's Web API feels dirty. Different git server implementations use a different API. Its just not a great setup.

39
purple.co 1y ago 💬 1

Looks like an option that can be set by maintainers, and default can be wiki or a long note ( readme ). At some point in time some settings will be require for a repository. I prefer local only client only, no server side, and cached if is possible.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
Silberengel 1y ago 💬 1

Yeah, choice between a long-form note or a markdown file in the repo, would be nice. 🤔

#[4] #[5]

Avatar
Silberengel 1y ago

default wiki sounds good to me