If you wanted to know who was involved with Epstein, you wouldn’t ask for any list. A yes or a no answer is too easy to cater to. You can just lie.

You’d want to results (as in unaltered) of the actual investigation- including the timestamps and paper trail from such investigation. You’d ask for any CP to be censored out and then you’d comb the timeline and what the investigators did to make your own assignment of who is potentially involved.

Simply being related in some way to a pedo doesn’t make you a pedo yourself. For a yes or a no answer on client list you could simply adjust your definition of who is a client - and that can be broadly defined. Investigators can simply say these people are not clients because there’s no proof (without lying about it), but that doesn’t clear them automatically- only open up new paths to investigate.

If such a report was not provided, then you’d have something to point a finger at and say see.. there’s something fishy going on.