In this case, I don’t think this is a “big thinker” specific issue, but a problem with all predictions in general. It’s just that we pay more attention to what is being said if it comes from someone who has the spotlights on them.

Humans are terrible at predicting the future, nobody is immune. The “most accurate” brains simply make many predictions. People forget the ones that didn’t come true and only focus on the ones that did. It’s no different than flipping a coin. Sometimes it’ll be heads, other times tails. If you consume enough information and have a general understanding of things, you are bound to make some predictions that come true simply by following trends and connecting the dots between several trends and what they may lead to.

The problem is, once in a while it’s tempting to say something outrageous for attention. Some people go wild and write books on things they read about and connect to form “original ideas”. But, none of it is original.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Philip Tetlock has studied prediction and discovered that some people really are better at. The difference is that they have better cognitive habits than most of us: They continually update their beliefs with new evidence, they remember the base rate, they’re less susceptible to cognitive biases, etc.

https://slatestarcodex.com/2016/02/04/book-review-superforecasting/

Interesting but I wouldn’t buy it without seeing how he conducted his studies. They could just be statistical variances confused for something more.