Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar corndalorian

Not giving them unfettered access to a smartphone or a social media account is different than not letting them have any access to the internet. Not sure which you’re advocating for because you’ve said both. Either way, I don’t think we disagree as much as we agree. Parents, not the state, are the right people to address these issues with their kids. I’m old enough, have young kids of my own, and they have access to the internet and smart devices with our oversight and guidance. Unfettered access would be stupid. But so is keeping them from learning how to use modern technology responsibly by taking it away completely. Anyway, this wasn’t supposed to be an argument. Parents need to be in control of this for their kids’ safety and upbringing, not the state. 🤝

Avatar
closed 1y ago

The funny thing is that this is the same argument of the state... are we seen as children by the rulers? 🤔

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
corndalorian 1y ago

It’s not the same argument because in my case we are talking about actual children and how their parents, whom are ordained to raise them, do so. In the case of the state, they are talking about free adults over whom they want to unrightfully rule with no restrictions.

Thread collapsed