The arbitrary timeframe game is so exhausting with its tiny crumbs of validity.

But I do acknowledge that is how they think. They latch onto their favorite timeframe that fits their bias.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Yep, I'd argue 4 years isn't that arbitrary. We as btcers have argued that holding 4 years leads to big nGu.

All I'm saying is without nGu it will be tougher to get individuals to understand BTC more deeply. It's our Trojan horse.

Fair point.

None of their savings accounts have doubled in four years. Their investment accounts benefited by record-breaking money printing, yes.

Yep, it's hard for them to see past that.

Maybe financial censorship will get bad enough to be a supplemental salesman