i didn’t. read the source tweets, not the headlines
#asknostr
Why would nostr:nprofile1qqsgydql3q4ka27d9wnlrmus4tvkrnc8ftc4h8h5fgyln54gl0a7dgspzemhxue69uhhyetvv9ujuurjd9kkzmpwdejhgqg5waehxw309aex2mrp0yhxgctdw4eju6t0qy2hwumn8ghj7un9d3shjtnddaehgu3wwp6kyfehcpn endorse X as freedom technology, when it is just as centralized as any other legacy social media?
Why not mention nostr?
Discussion
Thank you for the clarification.
But the source (your tweet) mentions in paranties, that we are on one. And it is a post on X. So what do I understand wrong, in that you consider X a freedom technology.? I am confused. 🤨
I was reading the same thing. I am perplexed too. Am I misreading it? Never see X as freedom tech if it has community guidelines and it has the power to ban people. Especially it's business model is ads which Jack admitted (the businessmodel). My other guess is he still have 3% stocks on X (based on his conference). But I maybe wrong.
that would imply there are source tweets to read.