If you can't win an argument against human/bot but can win the same argument against just a human, it is not the helping hand that is pathetic but the fact that you are winning the argument against that person just because she/he can't articulate the intricacies of the counterargument as effectively as LLM.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

you don't win an argument against an LLM, because there's nothing to win. the moment someone uses ai they have forfeited, because their arguments make no sense anymore

An argument defending a subject truth is based on deductional knowledge that can be easily proved to a machine. Subjective truth doesn't merit the effort to be argued against.

**defending an objective truth