Nostr

I believe there is a misunderstanding here. I am not on President. Putin's side. I am far too uninformed to understand his arguments or geopolitics in general. I only understand two things: He has presented his reasons, and the media (really all the typical ones I have seen) are attacking the reporter's reputation.

Engaging with President Putin's arguments could potentially start a dialogue. But as he says, this has been categorically prohibited.

So, as I said, I'm not taking sides here. I'm simply criticizing the emotional envy-driven reaction of the mainstream media to this interview.

zebra 1y ago

I see your point. agree.

> Engaging with President Putin's arguments could potentially start a dialogue. But as he says, this has been categorically prohibited.

There is a post from BBC (not sure) journalist who says that they sending daily request to interview Putin but he refuses.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

alp 1y ago

Seems like, he's been waiting for the right unbiased reporter. I don't know ...

zebra 1y ago

unbiased is a funny term for Tucker )

can't say I agree. Putin is a person who used to talk with domestic journalists who only ask authorized questions. if you were more familiar with the situation you'd realize that Tucker didn't ask any tough questions, and didn't rise any uncomfortable topics. Except maybe the gas pipe

alp 1y ago

His interview questions were rather unsuggestive, quite unlike what CNN or BBC typically present. It's true that he has a specific political orientation privately, which is evident to everyone. However, intellectually, he seemed to struggle to keep up, in my impression.

zebra 1y ago

> However, intellectually, he seemed to struggle to keep up

I prefer to think that Tucker was surprised because interview went not how he expected.

to give you an example of Putin's intelligence - in interview Putin said that Zelensky father was WWII soldier. Zelensky father was born 1947.

I can give you more examples )