Although it is a good question. It's obviously a little hard to truly understand the science as it has now been fully obfuscated by politics and money interests. However, we can be clear on a few things:

1: CO2 is a trailing indicator and the chances that its' concentration is truly impacting climate in any major way is negligible.

2: The increasing concentration is causing a greening of the planet as one would expect and we have bounced off a very dangerous minimum level.

3: If you can work though all the data and figure out what is real and it turns out the planet is truly heating a lot (not obvious to anyone who remembers the romans were making wine just south of hadrians wall!), then we don't truly understand what's causing it.

My point here is fairly simple. What if reducing CO2 levels is countering a normal feedback loop? If that's the case, what are the implications? Has anyone thought this through at all? I doubt it