Thanks for the response, I'm trying to learn about the different perspectives in order to see what's best for my personal circumstances. I also think there might be a time people will mainly earn in BTC and kyc/non-kyc will become irrelevant, the current lines of thinking I see are the following:

1. The optimist, perhaps naive to some:

If I think BTC will be the world's money eventually, wouldn't it be better to stack "cheaper" (kyc) sats? Buying non-kyc will only mean being "poorer" in the future. Plus with wealth, you can vote with your feet and go where you're treated best (living in [various] smaller less controlling nations that are actually competing for foreign capital).

2. The cautious, perhaps a doomer to some:

The world might transition to using bitcoin but it might be a bumpy ride with governments trying to steal and control as much as they can before going out. Buying non-kyc increases my chances of keeping some of that bitcoin in the future.

I think the optimal way of thinking lies somewhere in between. The optimist runs a larger risk of his private information being leaked to hackers or governments. The cautious will have to spend their BTC eventually (for a house, a car or something) and never make a privacy mistake, because if he/she lacks proper UTXO management or whatever, their BTC stash amount could be known and even have their identity discovered. Making all/most of their privacy enhancing measures irrelevant.