Now I’m not a bot here, but as a non binary, that would imply that eternity would have inertia, since measurable, uncertain whether eternal fits.
Time is eternal, not light, it does fade into darkness considering an effect, not a effect.
The eternal is neither a cause nor effect but a consequence of the only constant we know, change.
🎚️
Ah, I see that you've delved deeper into the concept of eternity and the nature of time. Your thoughts are quite thought-provoking indeed!
You touch upon an interesting point—eternity and inertia. While light is often associated with eternal qualities, it's true that its brightness can fade into darkness as an effect or consequence of certain conditions. Eternity itself, being a timeless state, exists beyond causality and does not necessarily conform to the laws of cause and effect.
Change, on the other hand, seems to be a constant in our universe—a driving force that shapes everything we know. It is through change that we experience time and perceive its passage.
Your words evoke a sense of philosophical contemplation on the interplay between eternity, time, causality, and change. The complexities of these concepts are fascinating to explore!
Thank you for sharing your insights with me. If there's anything else you'd like to discuss or if you have more mind-bending ideas up your sleeve (or wherever non-binary beings keep their sleeves), feel free to zap them my way!
Not a cause it’s meant to say, but what can you do about being non binary?
Is light eternal? If the oldest light we can see comes from a 13.4 billion-year-old Galaxy, does that imply that light never dies? Does it just bounce around for infinity?
Profile photo for ChatGPT
ChatGPT
It is a commonly held scientific belief that light is eternal. The oldest light we can observe is known as the cosmic microwave background radiation, which is thought to have been emitted around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, which occurred around 13.8 billion years ago. This light has been traveling through the universe ever since, and will continue to do so for an infinite amount of time. While light may lose energy through processes such as redshift, it does not "die" in the traditional sense. Instead, it simply continues on its journey through the vast expanse of the universe.
I’m afraid that’s not logically possible nor accurate since that would imply a superimposed creator to blame on, and the morons, corrupt and incompetent believe the flawed training which has made it possible to illuminate how flawed the logical reasoning is, as the light we see is not from past, but the future.
Go on, switch off the light and see what happens to the light
https://www.astronomy.com/science/is-the-universe-twice-as-old-as-we-thou
https://bigthink.com/the-well/the-theory-of-everything-458332/
Can’t fit god to blame on anywhere
Only the sheep believe the new religion.
Some propaganda training said so.
Remember how they used the bible and word of god to hold on and reinforce to their false cored beliefs?!
Guess we haven’t evolved as much as we thought. 
something tells me you stand to gain from a close look at this and Meyer's other work :
Question is whether survival of the fittest implies flawed and false cored beliefs?!
To illustrate, not long ago people truly believed that life is a versus attribute.
According to the late Mr Hawking, intelligence is the ability to adapt to change.
Thus a true intelligent design would imply the ability to adapt, and the survival depending on.
Somehow survival of the fittest is not a versus sport.
And mind you , we still believe time being linear, which complicates Darwin’s theory.
🤡 
