Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar arfonzo

I completely agree with this take, and I'm saying that as someone who works at an AI company...

Vibe coding will rarely end well.

Using AI intelligently to speed up your development cycle, while understanding (and correcting) the plethora of places it goes wrong, requires a deep understanding of software engineering and architecture. Pure vibe coders rarely get this bit, and that's why it often ends badly.

I mean no offense, because I think AI can be a great and powerful tool. But it does not mean you don't need to study how good software is engineered, strictly define scope, and manage your AI like you would any other developer on the team, to ensure code quality and sane architecture.

nostr:nevent1qvzqqqqqqypzpk3xu49cdjdrjkjzx09m2s87925nekk54xm90m26wf80a4v9n53aqy88wumn8ghj7mn0wvhxcmmv9uqzqnnfanv0zfpq6d7wczdjhs93e6cddrfsyajvr42g7vrhx5ml63decrundz

Avatar
Chris Jackson 4d ago 💬 1

I used AI assist quite a bit, and I always review the code and correct it as I go along, AI always needs babysitting.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Avatar
arfonzo 4d ago

Same, agree with you completely. Use it to release us from the grunt work involved in coding some things but never give it autonomy without cross checking everything it's done.

Thread collapsed