Online, it's the women that rape.

It's an inconvenient but incontrovertible facti that the "online threat"ii variety of pseudo-rapeiii is a form of typically feminine communication, employed generally by women.iv

Why do they do it ? Well, for a variety of perfectly sensible, long understood and well documented reasons. Such as :

A. Women shit test. The representation of the activity of sexual intercourse to another woman is perhaps the oldest topic of conversation among women. It allows the sexually experienced subjective woman to judge the sexual experience of the objective woman she's harassing. The reaction of woman to description of sexual intercourse (especially when presented as the nude act, purposefully and deliberately denue'd of the various clothes put on it by the fashions and mores of every generation like on a mutually shared Barbie doll) is mediated by her coy behaviour , and being mostly instinctual it is also mostly honest.

This, incidentally, is why women that fail to respond "adequately" to rape threats (which is to say, women that fail to respond like little girlsv, running away in horror at the naked story of fucking) become, at least as far as the discourse of their peer testing them is concerned, "whores". Women value each other (but not themselves - this is a fundamental tensionvi ) in terms of sexual experience.

B. Women build hierarchies. Always and everywhere, a group of women is a structured group, without exception to the degree the two might as well be synonymous.vii To quote myself,

mircea_popescu: "If you were planning to kill someone, would you helpfully tell him first ?"

Saturday, 07 February, Year 7 d.Tr.