Hard disagree. It is desireable and expected that the ideal political system would be a stable equalibrium point. In other words, the ideal system would be able to maintain its own state and would even survive and return after moderate disruptions.
If a system can be disrupted by "the Jews" then its not an ideal system. If anarchy instantly devolves into monarchy or democracy, or communism, then it isn't the ideal system.
Anarchy is in place. Black market, etc.
Ya, and if you go out into international waters then no police officer is gonna arrest you for smoking crack. Black markets and darknets are just places outside of the state's jurisdiction, not proof that anarchy is implemented within their jurisdiction.
You could argue that if a system is truly good, then it will slowly be adopted in other jurisdictions, but the existence of communist China is not proof that the American state is flawed.
To summarize, I am talking about a stable equilibrium with respect to time within a jurisdiction, not unchangingness across all of space and all jurisdictions.
