That's the thing though...you don't understand any religious tradition well enough to be teaching religion to anyone so remarking upon the Aztec tradition as though you're well informed is disingenuous and is a literal instance of you bearing false witness to knowledge you do not have.

You're way out of your depth. I promise you I can interpret the Bible better than not only you, but better than anyone you've ever met and I can back up my "interpretation" with scientific evidence and ideas that are possessed of scientific plausibility...things that explain Noah's flood...things that explain the Genesis "creation" story (it's not a creation story but you dogmatists will never figure that out).

You probably can't even explain why there is a discrepancy and qualifier associated with Matthew and Mark's differing accounts of Jesus' dying words. You probably think you know what Jesus said but you don't and the fact that you don't means you falsely believe that God can abandon anyone. That's absurd and would have been absurd to Jesus. Jesus was speaking a language that nobody in the Levant would have known because nobody else traveled like Christ did and the few who did were merchants, not geniuses.

Your own tradition is a Frankenstein. Baptism is Egyptian. The Eucharist is Greek. Christ derives from Chi and Rho which is both Egyptian (Cairo, Hieroglyphics, etc.) and Greek (Chiron, hierophant, hero, Hera, Heracles, chariot, etc.) Santa Clause is the Siberian reindeer shaman. Christ learned from the Druids, Egyptians, and the Nagas during the missing years of the New Testament. The early gatherings of followers of Christ didn't call it "church". They called it "the way" which is a direct homage to "the Tao" which is something Christ likely picked up travelling and learning in the far east.

Dogmatists who claim to love their neighbor as themself are hypocrites.

You can't be a dogmatist and love your neighbor. Dogmatists are heresy hunters, not common ground hunters.

I'm sorry that the people you trusted lied to you. I'm sorry that you are gripped by some sort of Stockholm syndrome variant. I'm sorry that you choose to be afraid of ideas in an age where everyone's ideas are very easy to explore online.

The only holy war is internal and it is between love and fear. Your own book echoes the sentiment of "be not afraid" well over 100 times, so you really need to get over your fear control mechanism that was installed into you by those upon whom you were dependent for your survival growing up.