As little as fiat has any value without the government waging wars and so on.
Hence, what’s there to cheer on about when inheriting the same general dynamic that fiat has but without people being able to regulate their governments?!
This besides infringing on protected intellectual property without Satoshi being able to cash out.
We suggest you start here with the book inventing Bitcoin by #[5] Pritzker. It's a fantastic read and aimed at educating beginnners.
Hello hello.
Much obliged for the response, ase title is quite captivating, and a skim through the podcast, a few comments caught my attention, like how Bitcoin is being marketed as a speculative system investment to invent bitcoin which well, is quite paradoxical and contradictory considering how system invented created bitcoin but somewhere along the lines, the money must have gone lost into speculation since never having reached system, but inventing bitcoin is a fantastic book title.
Adore the subtle book aspect of actually inventing bitcoin since the speculative bubble kinda comes to an end, but still fascinating. At least as a speculative investment, the value is not only dependent upon the market value of bought in value, but curious how an speculative investment for an existing currency is working out?
Then question is of course the time which these speculators are betting on or against from which going involved in the jumping board and space to learn, already is demonstrating the sense of time where the influx of money into the system is quite remarkable as a speculative asset to argue hard to keep up on it.
“Speculation as a funding for the revolution”
Arguing abstractions being a factor for cryptocurrency is questionable.
🤔
Bitcoin is not normal?
Strange comment from an educator
The cryptographic technology is difficult to understand?
People don’t need to know about immutable datastorage?
And these are the experts to book inventing system to bitcoin?
Bitcoin as a speculative investment where the inventing is “booked” sure does have that spanking potential to it where the risk becomes the feature to be abstracted into sam becoming famous.
For a closer type of analysis, quite weak.
Why would it be difficult for a normal person to understand bitcoin?
Are these unnormal people talking about bitcoin?
Bitcoin as a speculative investment implies centralized ownership and development, how does that work for Bitcoin as an speculative investment for inventing bitcoin?
Dissing other cryptocurrencies running on the same exact blockchain technology is weak. What differs bitcoin and other cryptocurrencies except how much governments are imploring for transactions people don’t need to worry about?!
Fastest systems? Really, the time is drawing dead to a false cored temporal causality because some people can’t tell the right time.
What’s that? Can’t have direct transactions between USA and China?
Why not? Hashing is not a problem for nationalities?
The hardware is hard to produce? 3D printings?
🤣😂🤣
It’s own power production? What are you? Growing weed laundering the money?
Each miner to have what now?!
😂
Why on earth would a dedicated power source be needed?
Hunt for energy?
😂
“This innovation”
Here the real world starts to touch our digital world?
Capture real world system in a digital world? Lottery on the system?
🤣😂🤣
Guess the gentlemen in the video haven’t attended my temporal mechanics seminars to learn.
😂
Burning energy? Number of atoms in the universe?
Not sure whether the lottery is that improbable to hit.
Real world resources have to be burned to produce it?
Your pot smoking is not a factor for system to work.
😂
Fiat is not not scarce, as backed, or supposed to be backed by gold.
Time is a scarce resource, but off limits from bitcoin.
Getting out of the system requires being part of system to start with, but the discussion of speculative investment for “this innovation” to happen are contradictory to bitcoin as a working currency.
Enabling governments to make anonymous transactions is probably how a civil war sets in.
Why a currency is better than the other is direct reflection on waging wars.
Money that is yours alone without fiat dependency?
Where is the investments coming from?
Magic?
People should be able to do what they want with their money when paying taxes for the freedom. That’s how liberties work.
The only thing Bitcoin enables in regards of freedom is for governments and corporations to by pass people’s laws and regulations, since the more we give up in regards of control as people, the more the government’s and corporations are able to fund wars and questionable corporate profits, like investing in Venezuelan bitcoins to pay off cocaine debts.
China is not a good country to be in?!
Being a Bitcoin evangelist and argue that being in China is not good is a real indication of being on a imploding false cored temporal causality bound to be disappointed or is spanking.
I’m afraid bitcoin as a speculative investment is not freedom of money.
Nothing is perfect.
#awkward
I’m afraid we must ask for permission for that liberty.
A Russian and a Jew having a Bitcoin discussion going jail time as a justification to be speculative?!
There is a joke in here somewhere
To quote them.
Nothing seems more meaningful than this.
Happy birthday, Albert Einstein
“Help people understand what it was”
Freud is having a field day
Self evolving AI system?
Relevant to bitcoin how?
Bitcoin is not for criminals, but by criminals.
A world changing thing while on a false cored temporal causation?!
Please don’t.
😂
So if people need to exchange fiat to bitcoin for bitcoin to serve a purpose, then why a speculative innovation investment?
And would everybody exchange their fiat to bitcoin, how would that be any different from the current system where people are in control, rather than governments and corporations?!
Banks are still regulated by people in democratic countries, while bypassing that doesn’t really serve people since the economic muscle which governments and corporations have.
Way to go enslaving people further demonizing their own government which they vote for.
System capitulating?
😂🤣😂
Who cares about humans?
Humans are a extinct species to the earthlings.
To err is a human shortcoming.
Being right about a currency? Isn’t that a question of political drives of conflict rather than invention?
If you’re not expecting bitcoin to take over the world, then what are you even speculating on? Spanked?
“I want that for five percent of humanity”
“I want five percent of people to escape their shitty countries”
All or nothing, right?
Then there is the fact when governments go digital which is gonna be where Bitcoin will have peaked, offering the same security which conventional banking systems offer where you keep your money, unless Bitcoin creates value on its own.
Money is besides being “controlled” by the government, it’s also insured by the government, which Bitcoin is not, which would mean that would Venezuela choose to cash out, everybody lose money.
Slaves to causality arguing being in charge of their own destiny is remarkable.
What do you mean you can’t leave your country with your money in the bank?
Not sure how many countries that have implemented bitcoin exchanges yet.
Let’s demonize china
😂
Attacking bitcoin is not a technology requirement, but would a governments pullout their weapons and drug moneys when people are using it to spend their salaries would crush the economy, which would kill the economy, making that bitcoin saving not even be worth a happy meal.
By the time Bitcoin is safe and secure as regulated fiat is, it won’t be any different.
How for bitcoin to replace the backing of gold without creating any value?
Why is Satoshi being anonymous a good thing?
In a technical manner, we cannot infringe upon satoshis intellectual property brand rights.
How to justify a quadrupled price without adding significant value or without mothering wars?
Considering the time the video was produced, to date, kinda off target.
Expecting several generation för adaptations is not a realistic expectation when doubt the governments are just gonna surrender economic control when as simple to convert to binary systems.
Oh wait, that’s what’s modern banking is, right?
And expecting a global currency without creating backing value won’t happen.
That was quite interesting, and thank you for the podcast.
Now, tell me Mr Pritzker, how has your view of bitcoin evolved since the interview?
Special case when receiving information from Twitter and other very biased platforms?!
Also, what are the plans for swan.com’s future, considering the open positions which is presumed for us meeting here?!
Would there be any interest in licensing #bit, mainvolume’s binary intelligence technology for better adaptation to coin, and this since without #mainvolume’s bit, binary intelligence technology, it’s just a coin!
Very pleasing to make your acquaintance.
