Nostr Web Client

jb55 8mo ago

There are only two quadrillion, one hundred trillion bitcoins

nostr:note1y9epjkdfxw8chs7re9yp8uvx9geqmcuaclme4fgzneq32gsjwslsvcgjmk

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

Nice and Kind Vic 8mo ago

Less than that from coin destruction

Harley 8mo ago

What’s wrong with Sats?

Schroedinger 8mo ago

Nothing

Anders 8mo ago

so eloquent /s

jb55 8mo ago

right ... 😅

kpr797 8mo ago

Did you mean to say satoshis instead of bitcoins?

jb55 8mo ago

bip177 proposes calling sats bitcoins

kpr797 8mo ago

Are people actually taking that seriously?

jb55 8mo ago

yeah

kpr797 8mo ago

Seems like a silly idea. Bitcoin is said to be infinitely divisible, that it can be divided as much as would ever be required to accommodate worldwide use and adoption. Are we going to redefine what the word bitcoin means every time we sub-divide it further?

Daniel Wigton 8mo ago

I am now advocating calling 1E-4 BTC a Bitoshi.

gandlaf21 8mo ago

ego-bip

Felix 8mo ago

Maybe a Satoshi would be a good name for 100m Bitcoins?