Global Feed Post Login
Replying to Avatar jb55

ai has been teaching me physics at a way faster pace than i was learning by myself ten years ago. Now i have self generated ai podcasts that go into advanced concepts on demand...

I got grok3 deep search to recommend the best source to learn N=4 super yang mills. It directed me to david tong’s lecture notes on super symmetry. So now i’m deep diving into that. Then i use ai to summarize the lecture notes.

I’m using chatgpt deep research to explore intersections of ideas i’ve read about, like twistor theory, double copy, and amplituhedron/positive grassmanians. It is able to find lots of interesting cutting edge papers that relate to each other.

Considering I’m an amateur physics enjoyer thats able explore the interplay between these complex topics has been mind blowing. I’m convinced we’re going to have an acceleration of physics breakthroughs once physicists start using these tools for research.

Avatar
Globe99 10mo ago

I find it's great at summarizing a field, or giving a very generalized "look over there" kind of answer to top-level questions about scientific inquiry.

But I've found they (at least Google Gemini) can mess up sometimes... Like, citing something that actually shows the opposite of what they claim.

I think they're very incentivized to give "an answer", when there are important situations where the correct answer is "we don't know" or "your question doesn't make sense," etc.

Reply to this note

Please Login to reply.

Discussion

No replies yet.